City's Graffiti Busters Curb Tagging in Local Neighborhoods
A team of five men with two trucks responded to about 2,500 tagged sites this year in 23 neighborhoods throughout the city.
Walking through West Roxbury, Marc Abelard has noticed more graffiti on storefronts, on the sides of buildings and throughout his neighborhood in general. In the last eight months, he says, tags have gotten bigger and the taggers have grown bolder.
“My fear is if it's not curbed, it’s going to spread to individual homes,” Abelard said.
Too late. It already has.
Enter Michael Bartosiak, executive director for the city’s Property Management and Construction department, and the leader of Boston’s Graffiti Busters: a team of five men with two trucks who scrub away the spray paint on commercial and residential buildings in 23 neighborhoods throughout the city.
West Roxbury is actually on the low end, with only 15 tags between July 2011 and July 2012. Back Bay and Jamaica Plain, on the other hand, are two of the most tagged neighborhoods, with 267 and 266 responses, respectively. The South End falls in the middle with 108; Fenway with 54; the North End with 49; Charlestown with 32 and Beacon Hill with 19.
There's usually an uptick in the summer (apparently taggers don't enjoy standing outside on a 10-degree winter night with a can of spray paint) and in the fall when students return, particularly in the Fenway, Back Bay and Mission Hill neighborhoods.
"We all hope they grow out of that fad, but you have a whole new group the next year," he said.
Back Bay is also an ideal target because it's easy to hide in all the dark alleys or duck behind a car. It often helps when locals step up to the plate – like the Back Bay Graffiti NABBers , who have taken neighborhood graffiti into their own hands and are even trying to get motion-sensor cameras installed on buildings where tagging is known to take place.
Bartosiak, who has been involved since the city program began in 1995, said overall graffiti has decreased as a result of a better response rate and more people reporting incidents.
You can call the mayor's 24-hour hotline at 617-635-4500 to report tags. The Citizens Connect service, where people can report graffiti directly to the city over their phone , has played a big role in decreasing tags.
“It comes right to my desk,” Bartosiak said. And if it's not something his department handles, he can pass it on to the Parks and Recreation Department if it’s a park bench that’s been vandalized, or the MBTA if it’s a road sign.
The Graffiti Busters deal primarily with tags on residential and commercial buildings, saving local businesses and residents big bucks.
If someone paints a dirty word across your front door, the special removal solution alone costs about $500, and it could run upwards of $1,000 to call someone to take care of it. The city does it for free – and they do it a lot.
Last year they responded to about 2,500 sites with tags that ranged from one square foot, to 50 feet long and 10 feet high, Bartosiak said. They’ll get rid of it within 30 days, but will respond immediately for anything that’s racial or offensive.
“Some people don’t know we exist,” Bartosiak said. “I still hear that after 17 years. It’s a free program, and it’s your tax dollars going back to you.”
However, he wants to remind people to be as specific as possible when reporting an incident. It’s not uncommon for the team to receive a wrong address or to go to a site and overlook graffiti that’s small and hard to see. In other words, if something is painted on your 2-by-2 inch windowsill, say so when reporting it. Don’t just mark ‘other’ and hope they find it.
Much of the success has been because of the support from the community.
“They believe in the program, he said, "because when they call it in, we show up and get the job done."
Number of sites the Graffiti Busters have cleaned up, by neighborhood:
| FY 2012 | FY 2011 | |
| Jamaica Plain | 266 | 114 |
| Back Bay | 267 | 168 |
| South End | 108 | 49 |
| Fenway | 54 | 106 |
| North End | 49 | 35 |
| Charlestown | 32 | 28 |
| Beacon Hill | 19 | 37 |
| West Roxbury | 15 | 16 |
Top neighborhoods in the city targeted for graffiti
| FY 2012 | FY 2011 | |
| Allston | 324 | 343 |
| Brighton | 134 | 111 |
| Back Bay | 267 | 168 |
| Jamaica Plain | 266 | 114 |
| Dorchester | 207 | 216 |
| Mission Hill | 155 | 101 |
Charlie Denison
11:51 am on Monday, July 16, 2012
What about Allston? There tends to be quite a bit of tagging going on there.
Randy Campbell
12:48 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012
The Nograf Network provides help and information to cities as well as others on ways to fight graffiti. We have been doing this now for 25 years and here is the main thing we have learned.
Cities spend enormous amounts of money on painting over or removing graffiti, and next to nothing to actually stop it. If you just remove graffiti, your cost will continue year after year. Cities must learn what is needed to actually catch vandals in the act, and then get them into the court system where controls can be placed on them.
I am a big fan of graffiti removal since we spent many years educating cities that quick removal is very important, but I have also learned that it is hopeless unless you vigorously try to catch them and stop them from future acts.
There are currently a couple tools available that have proven themselves to work, in some cases where the system has been deployed, a dozen vandals were caught and arrested in just 48 hours. That is 12 vandals who will be seeing a Judge and having some controls placed upon them to try and stop the behaviors. Help is out there for cities, and it works. Cities just need to get out of this "just cover it" mindset, so they can start reducing their annual graffiti cost.